Causes of Persecution
Early
Testimonies
Justin’s Apology
Clement and Historians
"Fulfill
ye my joy, that ye be like-minded, having the same love,
being of one accord, of one mind."—Phil. 2:3.
1.
THE death of Domitian, in 97, introduced Nerva, a tolerant
emperor to the throne. In 98, Trajan became possessed of the
sceptre, whose prejudices were very strong against the
followers of the Lamb. Persecuting edicts were issued, and
the commencement of the century was
100
the beginning of fresh trials to the professors of the
gospel. Pliny, the governor of Pontus and Bythinia,
107
inquired of Trajan what policy he should pursue towards
Christians, as he felt convinced their destruction would
nearly annihilate the inhabitants of those provinces under
his governance. † Trajan replied, they should not be sought
for as heretofore; but if any were known openly to profess
Christianity, "let them be punished." Under this emperor
many Christians suffered death, and…
†
Lib. 10, Epis. 97.
…numbers,
even of the female sex, were racked, to occasion their
criminating each other. Adrian rather improved
117
the condition of Christians. Titus Antonius
Pious, succeeded, and proved himself a mild
138
prince; but when Marcus Aurelius Antonius ascended the
throne, he issued his cruel measures,
162
and Polycarp, with many in Asia and France,
180
were called to martyrdom. In 180, Commodus became head of
the government, and the condition of Christians became
tolerable; but on Severus succeeding,
198
the aspect was changed towards the churches: Asia, Gaul,
Egypt, and other provinces, were dyed with Christians'
blood.
2.
All historians speak of the Christian church sustaining, to
an eminent degree, the character of a pure virgin, for above
one hundred years. The severity of the times would check
insincere persons taking a profession; the examples of the
apostles and their successors were still kept in view;
besides, the churches were composed of obscure persons in
the estimation of the world; nor did learning adorn her
ministers, so as to awaken any fears of rivalship among the
philosophers or literati of the day. Yet their obscurity,
with their "excess of virtue,"* was no guard to their lives
or property. It was a maxim with the Romans, to tolerate the
religions of those nations they conquered: but this
indulgence they extended not to the professors of the
gospel. Various reasons and motives combined to occasion an
alteration in their wonted policy, though the true grounds
are assigned by Paul Rom. viii. 7. Gal. iv. 29.
The
first Christians were poor; and their benevolence…
*
Gibbon's Hist. c. 15.
…towards each other was
calculated to keep them free of worldly incumbrances, yet it
is equally evident they were numerous, and the success of
the gospel enraged the pagan priests, who reported to the
governor the vilest accusations against them.* Those vile
reports were ably refuted by apologists, whose works were
presented to the emperor. † The insinuations of the enemy
were but too credulously regarded, and often regulated the
policy of the presiding governor. The priests lived by the
altars. In the public games, merchants, tradesmen,
mechanics, servants, and the rustic who sold the sacrifices,
were all interested in maintaining the pagan worship. Hence
that popular ridicule, contempt, and persecution, which
governments sometimes durst not, or could not, control.
Whenever religion influenced the heart, whether of parent or
child, it proved a kind of restless leaven, which attempted,
by every silent and lawful means, to impregnate the whole
body with which it stood connected, so that, Christianity
was often accused of disturbing the previous harmony of
families, and of infusing sectarian principles into the
inhabitants of towns and provinces. Nor did Christianity
feel in her proper station, in standing at a distance, and
surveying the region of misery with philosophic apathy; but
its advocates boldly advanced into the very centre of
infection, and endeavored to apply the only remedy provided
for its cure; yet such was the nature and desperate state of
the disease, that it urged the infected to aim the
destruction of every benefactor. "Beside, all other people
professed a national religion, and the multitude looked on
each other's idols…
* Some causes assigned for these calumnies by
Mr. Robert Turner, are supported neither by reason nor
evidence, particularly on Christians eating their own
offspring, c. 4.
† W. Reeve's Apologies of the
Fathers.
…with
indifference; but Christianity formed a sect of distinct and
separate character."* "It did not confine itself to the
denial or rejection of every other system: it carried on its
forehead all the offensive character of a monopoly, which,
when understood, spread an alarm over the Roman empire for
the security of its establishments."† Every awakening
providence, as earthquake, famine, drought, plague, &c., was
by pagans attributed to the anger of their gods against the
followers of the Cross; this view of things being impressed
on the minds of the multitude, often occasioned the rabble
to demand the blood and lives of valuable men.
Christianity
was observed to give dignity, composure, serenity, and
confidence, to its possessor, which was supposed by heathens
to be confirmed obstinacy—which many consequently resolved
to subdue. The religion of the Cross has, in all ages,
formed a bond of union among its disciples, to which no
heathen superstition made pretensions. The enemies of the
Lamb, being totally unacquainted with the genius and spirit
of Christianity, and the objects of its followers in uniting
together in social worship, misconstrued their motives,
attributed to them revolting crimes, and their love and
unity led to associations of a political character formed
against the government.
It
was also seen that Christianity ever maintained an
uncompromising character; it forbade its friends "to partake
of other men's sins," or to pour out libations, or throw a
grain of incense on the pagan altars: and this unsociable,
uncommunicable temper, in matters of religion, could be
regarded, by the best of the heathens, in no other light,
than arising from an aversion to mankind. ‡ From these…
*
Gibbon's Hist. c. 15
† Chalmers's Evid.
Christianity, c. 4, p. 105.
‡ Jones's Ecc. Lect.
v. L, p. 195.
…circumstances,
the pagans would never be destitute of materials for
misconstruction. As Christians would not themselves bow to
pagan rites, so they were alike careful to prevent any
character, however exalted, realizing the privileges of
their communion, without a strict conformity, in spirit and
conduct, to the requirements of divine revelation. They,
consequently, at times, became the objects of the most
unrelenting fury, for maintaining, in their ecclesiastical
community, purity of principle, and purity of practice.
3.
The Christian societies, instituted in the cities of the
Roman empire, were united only by the ties of faith and
charity. Independency and equality formed the basis of their
internal constitution;* and they were in every way
corresponding to churches of the Baptist denomination at the
present day, in the admission of members, discussing
affairs, dismissing, brethren, or excluding offenders.†
Though the churches sustained a primitive character for more
than one hundred years, yet, during this century, and
particularly towards its close, the scriptural simplicity of
the institution became obscured, from the introduction of
various rites borrowed from the Old Testament; and baptism
was now supposed to convey some peculiar advantages to the
receiver.‡ There being persons of narrow capacities, the
teachers of religion thought it advisable or expedient to
instruct such in the essential truths of the gospel, by
placing those truths, as it were, before their eyes, under
visible objects or images.
S
By these and other expedients, the purity of the original
institutions became sophisticated;…
*
Gibbon's Hist. c. 15.
† Mosh. Hist. C. 2, p. 2, c.
2, S 4. Robin. Res. p. 123. Campbell's Ecc. Lect. p. 122.
Jones's Ecc. Lect. v. i., p. 299.
‡See Wall and Bingham.
S
Mosh. Hist. C. 2, p. 2, c. 4,
S
6.
Early
Testimonies
…and
when once the ministers of religion had departed from the
ancient simplicity of the gospel, and sullied the native
purity of divine truth by a motley mixture of human
inventions, it was difficult to set bounds to this growing
corruption.*
4.
We shall now refer to the writers of this century on the
150
subject of Baptism; and the first we notice is JUSTIN
MARTYR, who was born of pagan parents, but became a
proselyte to the Jewish religion. Dissatisfied with his
profession, he embraced Christianity. His character is
obscured by his mixture of systems, and his figurative style
was calculated to lead astray. He taught, through natural
objects, to view Spiritual things, viz., "The cross
according to the prophet (Moses), was the great
characteristic of his power and government; almost every
thing we see resembles a cross;" the yards of a ship, the
head of a plough, the handle of a spade, &c.—"nay, man erect
with his arms extended, forms the cross." † He retained the
leading features of Christianity, and wrote ably in its
defence.
In
giving an account to the emperor, Justin says, "I shall now
lay before you the manner of dedicating ourselves to God,
through Christ, upon our conversion; for should I omit this,
I might not seem to deal sincerely in this account of our
religion. As many as are persuaded and believe that those
things which are taught by us are true, and do promise to
live according to them, are directed first to pray, and ask
God, with fasting, the forgiveness of their sins: and we
also pray and fast together with them. Then…
*
Mosh. Hist. C. 6, p. 2, c. 3,
S
1.
† Justin's Apol.
S
72. Reeve's trans. v. i., p. 96.
…we
bring them to some place where there is water; and they are
regenerated by the same way of regeneration by which we were
regenerated: for they are washed in the name of the Father,
&c. After he is baptized, and becomes one of us, we lead him
to the congregation of the brethren, where with great
fervency, we pour out our souls together in prayer, both for
ourselves and for the person baptized, and for all other
Christians throughout the world. Prayer being ended, we
salute each other with a kiss. Bread, and a cup of wine and
water, are then brought to the president or bishop, who
offers up prayer and thanksgiving in the name of the Lord
Jesus, the people concluding with a loud amen. The deacons
distribute the elements to those who are present, and carry
them afterwards to the absent members.* This food we call
the eucharist, of which none are allowed to be partakers,
but such only as are true believers, and have been baptized
in the layer of regeneration for the remission of sins, and
live according to Christ's precepts." † On this statement
Dr. Wall observes, this is the most ancient account of the
way of baptizing, next the Scriptures, and shows the plain
and simple manner of administering it. The Christians of
these…
*
Wall's Hist. of Inf. Bap. p. 1, c. 1,
S
3.
†
Justin's Apol.
S
79, 85, 86, Reeve's trans. Justin's Apology to the emperor
describes the dedication of believers in religion, but not
of infants! In
S
36, he deplores the way the heathens trained their children;
and
S 18, alludes to believers discipeling their
offspring to Christ. He does not refute the charge of
infanticide, by asserting that Christians dedicated their
children to Christ by baptism, though so favorable an
opportunity offered; at the same time, he evinces an anxiety
not to omit to his imperial maiesty any circumstance or
practice that would lessen the force of prejudices against
Christians. Justin has committed an unpardonable fault in
omitting the infant rite; unless, as was the case,
paedobaptism was unknown.
Justin’s
Apology
…times
had lived, many of them at least, in the days of the
apostles:*
Justin's
use of the term regeneration, instead of baptism, with other
figurative language, led the simple and unlettered to
conclude, that the import of the word was conveyed in the
ordinance. Too much dependence was, at this period, placed
on the eucharist; as is evident, in its being carried to
absent members after it had been prayed over. So the
simplicity of the supper was departing, by the mixture of
water with the wine: though the church still retained, in
its members and discipline, all the essentials of its
original constitution.
180
IRENAEUS , pastor of a church at
Lyons. He was a Greek by birth, and liberally educated.
Before he accepted the pastorate of Lyons, he lived at
Smyrna, under the religious instruction of Polycarp, one of
John's disciples. During his residence at Lyons, the
Christians were called to realise death in every form. A
creed is still extant bearing his name, and much of early
simplicity. † The following passage from his writings is
supposed by some to allude to the ordinance: "Christ passed
through all ages of man, that he might SAVE all by himself:
all, I say, who by him are regenerated to God—infants, and
little ones, and children, and youths, and persons advanced
in years:"‡ but these words refer to salvation, not baptism.
The word regeneration cannot, in this passage, be understood
to signify baptism, without attaching too much importance to
that ordinance. The same pious father regrets the conduct of
some "who thought it…
*
Wall's Hist. ubi sup.
† Le Clerc's Ecc. Hist. and
Jortin's Rcm. On Ecc. Hist. v. ii., b. 2, p. 2, p. 25.
‡ Facts opposed to Fiction,
p. 17.
Clement
and Historians
…needless
to bring the person to the water at all; but mixing oil and
water together, they pour it on the candidate's head."* How
deeply would Irenaeus grieve, did he live now!
190
CLEMENT, the schoolmaster and innovator, presided over a
school at Alexandria, to whom we shall again refer. He
observes, on the ordinance, "The baptized ought to be
children in malice, but not in understanding; even such
children who, as the children of God, have put off the old
man with the garments of wickedness, and have put on the new
man."†
5. Although unwarrantable
customs and ceremonies began to prevail at the conclusion of
this century in some churches, yet the ordinances of
religion were not diverted or altered from their scriptural
subject, which is supported by the best historians, as, "It
does not appear by any approved authors, that there was any
mutation or variation in baptism from the former century.”‡
"During
this century, the sacrament of baptism was administered
publicly twice a year, at the festivals of Easter and
Whitsuntide. The persons to be baptized, after they had
repeated the creed, confessed, and renounced their sins,
particularly the devil and his pompous allurements, were
immersed under water, and received into Christ's kingdom, by
a solemn invocation." After baptism, various ceremonies
ensued. S
Immersion universally prevailed, since all the ancients
thought that…
*
Wall's Hist. part 1, p. 406.
† Epis. III. in Bap. Mag. v.
i., p. 166
‡ Mag. Cent. c. 2, in
Danver's, p. 59.
S
Mosh.
Hist. c. 2, p. 2, c.4,
S
13.
…burying
under water did more lively represent the death, burial, and
resurrection of Christ.* The absence of infant baptism,
during the two first centuries, is fully acknowledged by so
many of the most learned among the Paedobaptists, that it is
quite unnecessary to copy their assertions. † Justin Martyr,
Athenagoras, Theophilus of Antioch, Tatian, Minucius Felix,
Irenaeus, and Clement of Alexandria, constitute the
Christian writers of this second century; who so far from
directly speaking of infant baptism, never once utter a
syllable upon the subject.‡
* Bingham's Antiq. of the
Christian church, b. 11, c. 11,
S
1.
† Booth's Pedo. Exa., C. 4,
p. 78; and c. 9, p. 194.
‡ Dr.
F. A. Cox on Bap. p. 156.