CHAPTER IX
A Number Of Baptist Activities
Alien Immersions-J. L.
Reynolds-Crosby-Philadelphia Association-The Case of James
Hutchinson-Jesse Mercer-The Christian
Review-Benedict-Education-Colombian College-The Triennial
Convention on Education-An Address-The Effect of the
Revolutionary War-The Charleston Association-Baptist
Education Society in the Middle States-The Massachusetts
Education Society-A School of Theological Instruction in
Philadelphia-Washington, D. C.-The Progress of the Colombian
College-President Monroe-The Resignation of Rice-Newton
Theological Institution-Hamilton College-The Education
Society in South Carolina and Georgia-Mercer College-Other
Colleges-State Conventions-The General Convention of Western
Baptists-Home Missions in the West-Sunday Schools-Baptist
Publication Society-Newspapers and Periodicals-Conclusion.
In all this period of strife and
schism the Baptists were slowly groping their way into a place
of purpose and action. These troubles had a unifying effect. The
controversies in a measure proved a blessing. There were great
and unnecessary losses but these were not without compensations.
The subjects of
alien immersions and the proper administrator of baptism often
arose among the Baptists of this period. This was especially
accentuated by the defection of the anti-mission forces and the
followers of Alexander Campbell. After the American Civil War it
sometimes became acute. There have always been differences of
opinion on this subject; but among early American Baptists,
perhaps, the vast majority rejected such baptisms and accounted
them as invalid. Only a few instances and expressions can here
be quoted, but they are sufficient and authoritative enough to
indicate the general trend of the thinking of the denomination.
Professor J. L.
Reynolds, D. D., Professor in Columbia College, South Carolina,
formerly President of Georgetown College, Kentucky, and once
Professor in the Theological Department of Mercer University,
Georgia, says of rebaptism:
In Africa
the question attracted attention at an early period and
received a prompt decision . . . The ground on which the
validity of heretical baptism was denied, that there could
be no real baptism out of the true church.
He further
says:
The
Novatians, dissatisfied with the lax discipline of the
Church of Rome, seceded from it, A. D. 251, and organized
themselves on the most rigid principles. Claiming to be the
true church they baptized, without distinction, all who were
admitted to their communion. Applicants from other churches,
were of course, rebaptized. They were the first
Puritans-Cathari-and there is little doubt that they were
opposed to infant baptism . . . The ground assumed by those
separatists, as well as those who succeeded them, was that
the Catholic Church (so-called) was become corrupt and
anti-christian.
Again:
In all
cases of rebaptism to which I have referred, the principle
of action was the same-out of the true church there was no
baptism. This was a point on which all, whether heretics, or
Catholics, seem to have agreed.
He further
says:
The
Mennonites (so called from Menno, who died 1571) rebaptized
all who were admitted into their communion. Thin is the
statement of Neudecker, Lebrd. Dogmende, 621.
Once more:
The vast
body of the Mennonites adhered to the ancient practice which
they had received from the earlier Anabaptists (The
Christian Index, May 26 and June 16, 1843).
Thomas Crosby,
speaking of the Baptists in London, in 1615, says:
They
rejected the baptism of infants as being a practice which
had no foundation in Scripture; and all baptisms received
either in the Church of Rome or England, they looked upon to
be invalid, because received in a false church, and from
anti-christian ministers (Crosby, The History of the
English Baptists, I. 273. London, 1738).
The
Philadelphia Association, the oldest among the Baptists of
America, in the year 1788, decided against the validity
of baptism administered by persons who had not been lawfully
baptized and ordained. They assigned four reasons for the
decision. The fourth is as follows:
Because
such an administrator has no commission to baptize, for the
words of the commission were addressed to the apostles and
their successors in the ministry, to the end of the world,
and these are such whom the church of Christ appoint for the
whole work of the ministry.
Reference may
also be made to similar decisions of this Association in 1729,
1732, 1744, 1749 and 1758.
The Richmond
Association, in 1809, decided:
Three
things are required to make gospel baptism, viz.: a gospel
mode, s gospel subject and administrator (Benedict, A
General History of the Baptist Denomination in America,
II. 472. Boston, 1813).
In 1791 a case
was brought before the Ketockton Association which produced
considerable agitation. James Hutchinson, who was born in New
Jersey, but raised in Loudon county, Virginia, had gone to
Georgia, and there first became a Methodist, and then a Baptist
preacher. Previous to his joining the Baptists, he had been
baptized by a Methodist. When he offered to join the Baptists of
Georgia, it was made a question whether his baptism, being
performed by an unbaptized person, was valid! The Georgia
Baptists decided that it was valid.
In the year
above mentioned Mr. Hutchinson came to Virginia to see his
relations in Loudon county. While he was there, his preaching
became effectual to the conversion of many. Mr. Hutchinson
baptized them. These things stirred up the question in Ketockton
Association, whether the baptism of Hutchinson and his disciples
was valid. The decision here was just the reverse of the
decision in Georgia. They determined not to receive him or those
baptized by him, unless they should submit to be rebaptized.
After some time they consented, and the ordinance was
readministered (Semple, History of Virginia Baptists).
Jesse Mercer,
in a Circular Letter adopted and published by the Georgia
Association, in 1811, assigns "the reasons, briefly, which lead
us to deem Pedobaptist administrations, though in the proper
mode, invalid." The first reason assigned is:
The
apostolic church, continued through all ages to the end of
the world, is the only true gospel church.
After laying
down several propositions he proceeds:
From these
propositions, thus established, we draw the following
references, as clear and certainly true; That all churches
and ministers, ,and not successively to them, are not in
gospel order; therefore, cannot be acknowledged as such.
Again he says
in the same Circular:
Our reasons
for rejecting baptism by immersion when administered by
Pedobaptist ministers are
I. That
they are connected with churches clearly out of the
apostolic succession, and therefore clearly out of the
apostolic commission.
II. That
they have derived their authority, by ordination, from the
Bishops of Rome, or from individuals who have taken it on
themselves to give it.
III. That
they hold a higher rank in the churches than the apostles
did, are not accountable to it, and consequently not triable
by the church; but are amenable to of among themselves.
Further on he
remarks:
The
Pedobaptists by their own histories, admit that they are not
of it (the true line of the succession of the churches). But
we do not; sad shall think ourselves entitled to the claim
until the reverse is shown clearly. And should any man think
that authority derived from the Mother of Harlots sufficient
to qualify to administer a gospel ordinance, they will be so
charitable as not to condemn us from preferring that derived
from Christ . . . If any think the administration will
suffice which has no pattern in the Gospel, they will suffer
us to act according to the Divine order with impunity.
The
Christian Review,
Boston, 1846, in a long article on Rebaptism, says:
We next
consider the case of those who, though adults, baptized in
the proper mode and form, yet at that time held grossly
heretical doctrines; of adherence to which their baptism was
a profession to the world: such as Unitarians, who deny the
faith of the Trinity;-Universalists, who deny all future
punishment; Campbellites, whose acknowledgement that Jesus
is the Son of God implies neither a belief in the divinity
nor vicarious sufferings of Christ, nor a profession of a
change of heart. Even the Mormons, it is said, baptize in
the name of Jesus. When persons who may have been baptized
in a profession in any of these forms of error, are
afterwards brought to the truth as it is in Jesus, is it
their duty to be rebaptized- In such cases, the first
baptism, is surely to be regarded rather as a profession of
disbelief, than of belief in the fundamental doctrines of
Christianity. It should therefore be esteemed quite invalid,
and be repeated by those who embrace orthodox doctrines. Nor
can their subsequent faith make good their former baptism (The
Christian Review, July, 18l6. XI. 198, 199).
David Benedict,
the historian, probably held a more extensive correspondence
with the Baptists of America in his day than any other man. He
was doubtless correct when he summed up the situation as
follows: "I have ascertained by my extensive correspondence,
that by far the greatest part of our denomination both rebaptize
and reordain all who join them, from whatever churches they
come" (Benedict).
Much attention
was turned to educational matters. The origin of the Columbian
College was one of the general results of the Triennial
Convention. The necessity of well-educated missionaries and the
need of an enlightened ministry at home were keenly felt. There
was at that time no institution in this country connected with
the Baptists for the education of young ministers in theological
learning. Individuals, like Dr. Stoughton and others, had given
private instruction with ability and zeal. The time had arrived
when more enlarged and systematic measures were necessary. The
Convention justly concluded that one of the urgent needs was the
training of young ministers. In the Constitution of the
Convention it is stated that it is the duty of the Board to
"employ missionaries, and, if necessary, to take measures for
the improvement of their qualifications" (Art. IV.).
A Committee
consisting of Drs. Furman, Baldwin and Stoughton, was appointed
"to prepare an address on the subject of Foreign Missions, and
the general interest of the Baptist denomination." After a
fervent appeal to the churches for the support of foreign
missions, the following is added:
The efforts
of the present Convention have been directed chiefly to the
establishment of a foreign mission; but it is expected that
when the general concert of their brethren and sufficient
contributions to a common fund shall furnish them with
proper instruction and adequate means, the promotion of the
interests of the churches at home will enter into the
deliberations of future meetings.
It is
deeply to be regretted that no more attention is paid to the
improvement of the minds of pious youth, who are called to
the gospel ministry. While this is neglected, the cause of
God must suffer. Within the last fifty years, by the
diffusion of knowledge and attention to liberal science, the
state of society has become considerably elevated. It is
certainly desirable, the information of the minister of the
sanctuary should increase in an equal proportion. Other
denominations are directing their attention, with signal
ardor, to the instruction of their youth for this purpose.
They are assisting them to peruse the sacred writings in.
their original languages, and supplying other aids for
pulpit services, which, through the grace of the Holy
Spirit, may become eminently sanctified for the general
good. While we avow our belief, that a refined or liberal
education is not an indispensable qualification for
ministerial service, let us never loose sight of its real
importance, but labor to help our young men, by our
contributions, by the organization of education societies,
and if possible, by a general theological seminary, where
some, at least, may claim all the advantage which learning
and mature studies can afford, to qualify for acting the
part of men who are set for the defense of the gospel.
Improvement of this nature will contribute to roll away from
the churches the reproach of neglecting to support the
ministry of the word. They will be unwilling to receive for
nothing that which coat their ministers much (Minutes of the
Convention, 42, 43).
The
Revolutionary War came nigh destroying all educational work
among the Baptists. They had entered into the struggle for
independence with ardor. Their most useful ministers were
chaplains; and most of the male members bore arms in defense of
the country. The result was a universal dispersion, which
practically broke up the local habitation of the denomination.
For example, the First Church, New York, which at the beginning
of the war had over two hundred members, had been reduced to
thirty-seven at the close of the struggle. The tendency was to
destroy all of those institutions formed and sustained by
combinations-such were the institutions of learning and plans
for the education of the ministry. The compensation came with
the universal dissemination of the truth. These faithful men
went everywhere preaching the Word throughout the United States,
and thus the Baptists were exceedingly multiplied.
Comparatively
little was effected in behalf of education in the denomination
for nearly a half century after the commencement of the
Revolution. In addition to their dispersion through the
wilderness of an almost illimitable extent, a taste had been
acquired and habits formed, which were totally adverse to these
pursuits. Many, during this period, through necessity, entered
the ministry without any literary preparation, the tendency of
which was to diminish, in all, a sense of its importance. The
circumstances, added to the depressed condition of the country,
arising from the long continuance and severity of the war, and,
subsequently, from a depreciation of the currency, rendered a
recommencement of these efforts for the education of the
ministry exceedingly difficult.
The Charleston
Association had, in 1789, put in operation a plan to establish a
permanent fund for the education of ministers, and in 1792 the
committee was incorporated by the legislature of South Carolina.
So that by the year 1810 the committee had approximately
received for this fund ten thousand dollars; and had educated
thirteen young men for the ministry. Among this number were
Jesse Mercer and W. T. Brantly. The Warren Association followed
the Charleston Association in making, in 1791, similar plans.
Three years later the society was incorporated by the
legislature of Massachusetts.
The Baptist
Education Society, of the Middle States, was formed in 1812, at
Philadelphia: Its object is thus expressed:
Its avowed
and explicit object is, with a divine blessing, the
assisting of pious young mea in obtaining such literary and
theological aid as shall enable them, with greater ease to
themselves, to fulfill the public duties of the Christian
ministry (The Christian Review, June, 1837. II. 269)
.
At the next
Convention, May, 1817, Dr. Furman "placed before the body, in a
speech of considerable length and great interest, the very
serious and religious importance of a well informed ministry."
The following article was added to the Constitution:
That when
competent and distinct funds shall have been received for
the purpose, the board, from these, without resorting at all
to mission funds, shall proceed to institute a classical and
theological seminary, for the purpose of aiding pious young
men, who, in the judgment of the churches of which they are
members, and of the board, possess gifts and graces suited
to the gospel ministry (Art. XIV. Minutes of the Convention
for 1817, p. 139).
Through an
arrangement with the Education Society of Philadelphia a school
of theological instruction was opened in that city in a private
house, and a number of young men were received as pupils. W. S.
Stoughton was principal and Irah Chase one of the professors. So
that by the meeting of the Convention, in 1820, "a General
Education Plan," was adopted (The Latter Day Luminary,
II). The Constitution was again amended as
follows:
When the
Convention shall have located an institution for education
purposes, it shall be the duty of the board, under the
direction of this body, and exclusively from education
funds, to erect or procure suitable buildings, for the
accommodation of the students, and to pursue such measures
se may be found most conducive to the progress and
prosperity of the institution. They shall also judge of the
qualifications of persons approved by the churches as
possessing suitable gifts, and called of God to the work of
the gospel ministry, who shall apply for admission as
beneficiaries of the board. They shall have power to appoint
suitable instructors in the different departments of
education, and determine on the compensation to be allowed
them for their services, and superintend, generally, the
affairs of the institution.
The question of
the proper site for the institution was one of great importance,
and had for sometime occupied much attention. Philadelphia had
strong attractions, but a location further south was deemed
advisable. A location had been provided at Washington by Rice
and others. April 26, 1820, he had written as follows:
It has
afforded me no small pleasure to find it convenient,
incidentally to other matters in hand, to bestow some
attention to the object of providing at Washington a site
for the institution to promote the education of the
ministry, and ultimately for the foundation of a college,
under the direction of the general Convention.
These premises
were offered to the Convention, consisting of forty-six and
one-half acres, together with a building erected for the
purpose. The following resolutions came before the Convention
1.
Resolved. That the institution for the education of
gospel ministers be located in the city of Washington, or in
its vicinity, in the District of Columbia; and that the
board be directed to cause its removal thither, whenever
suitable preparations shall be made for its reception in
that place, and when, in their opinion, such a removal shall
be expedient.
2.
Resolved. That this Convention accept of the premises
tendered to them for the site of an institution for the
education of gospel ministers, and for a college, adjoining
the city of Washington; and that the board be directed to
take measures, as soon as convenient, for obtaining a legal
title to the same; and that the board be further directed to
keep the institution, already in a state of progress, first
in view, and not to incur expenses beyond the amount of
funds which may be obtained for the establishment of the
institution (The Latter Day Luminary, II. 128).
These
resolutions were adopted. For a period the college prospered
greatly. President James Monroe warmly commended the enterprise
as follows:
Its
commencement will be under circumstances very favorable to
its success. Its position north of the city, is remarkably
healthy. The act of incorporation is well digested, looks to
the proper objects and grants the powers well adapted to
their attainment. The establishment of the institution
within the federal district, in the presence of Congress,
and of all of the departments of government, will secure to
the young men who may be educated in it many important
advantages; among which the opportunity which it will afford
them of hearing the debates in Congress, and in the Supreme
Court, on important subjects, must be obvious to all (The
Latter Day Luminary, II).
But debt
occurred and the board loaned the college ten thousand dollars
of mission funds (Ibid, II. 363). At length things went
from bad to worse. In 1826 the Convention passed the following
resolutions:
Resolved, That no
charge against Luther Rice as to immoral conduct has been
substantiated.
Resolved. That many
imprudences are properly attributed to him, for which,
however, the urgent embarrassments of the College furnish at
least a partial apology.
Resolved, That from
the various developments it appears that Mr. Rice is a very
loose accountant, and that he has very imperfect talents for
the distribution of money (Minutes of the Convention for
1826, 18).
In April, 1827,
the entire faculty resigned, and the students were dispersed.
For a year there was no school. Rice was compelled to resign as
agent and treasurer though he never ceased to labor for the
college during his life. At a later period when he was led
candidly to consider the affairs of the institution he said:
Four
unfortunate errors produced, in the first instance, the
embarrassment of the institution, viz.: going in debt,-too
much cost and parade of faculty,-incautiously crediting
students, and supporting beneficiaries without means,-and by
remaining so much of my time at the college to assist in
managing its affairs, instead of being constantly out
collecting funds. This erroneous course was fallen into more
readily, because, at the time, funds were circulating freely
through the community, and subscriptions and collections
were easily obtained. But when debts were contracted, an
over proportion of faculty employed, students largely
indulged on credit, with beneficiaries on hand, a great
change took place in the financial condition of the whole
country; still, hoping the state of things would prove only
temporary, the correction was not immediately applied, as it
ought to have been, and serious embarrassment, at length,
began to be felt.
However
deplorable was the situation "the most searching investigations
of his conduct, in connection with the embarrassment of the
college leave not the shadow of suspicion on his integrity. In
his whole history as agent, he sought not his own; and for years
actually toiled without fee or reward beyond his personal
expenses." He fell on sleep September 25, 1836, in Edgefield
District, South Carolina. A large marble slab with a full
inscription was placed over his grave by the Baptist State
Convention of South Carolina. His only earthly possessions were
an old horse, a worn out buggy, and a spotless reputation which
he dedicated to Columbian College (Knowles, History of Columbian
College, The Christian Review, III. 115. Also VI. 321.
Sears, Memoir of Luther Rice). Unfortunately the
college had a troubled history from its inception.
The Newton
Theological Institution was founded by the Massachusetts
Education Society, at Newton Centre. A beautiful and elevated
site of seventy acres was secured for the institution. Under the
direction of Irah Chase the school was opened November 28, 1825.
There were present three students.
The Society
made the preliminary arrangements, in 1825, for the founding of
the Institution. The incipient measures are thus recorded:
May 26,
1825. Thursday morning, met at Dr. Baldwin-s, according to
adjournment. The Board took into consideration the
establishment of a theological seminary in the vicinity of
Boston; when the following preamble and resolutions,
proposed by brother Sharp, were unanimously adopted:
Whereas, it
appears to be the earnest desire of influential brethren in
our denomination, that there should be a theological
institution in the vicinity of Boston, therefore,
1.
Resolved, That it is highly expedient, that the Board
take immediate measures to accomplish thin important object.
2.
Resolved, That Rev. Dr. Baldwin, Rev. Mr. Sharp, and
Rev. Mr. Wayland, be a committee to draw up a plan for a
theological institution, and recommend such place or places
for its location, as they deem proper.
3.
Resolved, That Rev. Dr. Bolles, Deacon Heman Lincoln,
Rev. Mr. Going, Rev. Mr. Sharp, Mr. N. R. Cobb, and Deacon
Levi Farwell, be a committee to solicit subscriptions to aid
is the establishment of the institution aforementioned.
The first
meeting of the New York Education Society met in Hamilton, May,
1817; and as a result the Hamilton Institution, now Colgate
University, was founded in 1819. "It appears that in 1817," says
Joseph Belcher, "when three flourishing colleges were sustained
within the State, there were but three Baptist ministers in all
the State west of the Hudson, who had enjoyed the advantages of
a collegiate education. A general diminution of influence was
the inevitable consequence, and the attention of sagacious
brethren began to be drawn to the subject. In May, 1817, (at the
very time the venerable Dr. Baldwin, of Boston, was urging the
claims of ministerial education before the general convention
assembled at Philadelphia) five or six individuals (not knowing
of the meeting at Philadelphia) met at the house of deacon
Samuel Payne, in Hamilton, to converse and pray over the same
subject. Thirteen brethren, after mature and prayerful
deliberation, proceeded to organize the Baptist Education
Society !of the State of New York, subscribing one dollar
each" (Joseph Belcher, Hamilton Literary and Theological
Institution, The Baptist Memorial and Monthly Record,
153. May, 1844).
Many of the
ministers of Maine were conscious of their poor equipment for
their work. In a Circular Letter prepared in 1807, for the
Bowdoinham Association, Rev. Sylvanus Boardman characterized the
ministry of the district as it was very largely at that time,
when in a plea for the support of those whom the churches had
called to preach, he spoke of "their want of education, not
understanding their mother tongue, compelled to devote their
time to study, even to obtain a knowledge of the English
language sufficient to qualify them to acquire knowledge of
logic, mathematics or philosophy." Three years later the
association organized a plan of an institution to promote
literary and theological knowledge. Colby College was finally
located at Waterville, and a charter obtained February 27, 1813.
The Cincinnati
Domestic Missionary Society was formed in 1824 and one of
its objects was: "To promote the cause of gospel missions, and
the education of ministers, called, chosen and faithful." From
this movement the Granville College, now benison University, was
organized, at Granville, Ohio, December 13, 1831, with
thirty-seven students, the oldest among them being thirty-seven
years of age, the youngest eight. Twenty-seven of them were from
Granville, and all but two, William Whitney and Giles Peabody,
were from Ohio. There were five preachers among them.
John M. Peck
founded the Rock Springs Academy in Illinois. Several years
later he gives the following account of the enterprise:
In 1826,
when not a single academy or boarding school of any kind
(except the Catholic seminaries) existed in Illinois or
Missouri, I went to the Atlantic States, "on my own hook"
(to use a western figure), to obtain aid in the
establishment of a seminary. Next year, 1827, the building
and institution known as Rock Spring Seminary was started .
. . During that season (1826) I visited every prominent
institution, college, high school, etc., in my range of
travel, to learn all I could of their system of management.
The following
interesting incident is recorded:
One day a
young Presbyterian minister, Rev. John M. Ellis, a graduate
of Andover Theological Seminary, and who had then recently
come to Illinois, was riding on horseback through "the
Sangamon Country," as the region here in question was
called. As he was making his way over the lonely prairies,
interspersed here and there with patches of timber, he came
to a small clearing in the midst of hassle and black-jacks,
and was arrested in his progress by the sound of an axe.
Observing the woodsman more nearly, he called to him with
the question, "What are you doing here, stranger-" "I am
building a theological seminary." "What, in these barrens-"
"Yes, I am planting the seed." This was Dr. J. M. Peck,
founder of the Seminary at Rock Springs. Mr. Ellis was
afterwards active in originating the Illinois University at
Jacksonville.
This led to the
organization and ultimately to the founding of Shurtleff
College, at Upper Alton, Illinois (Baptist Memorial anal
Christian Chronicle, 204. July, 1842).
An education
society was organized in Indiana, in 1834, and in
1835, there appeared in The Cross and Journal, in
Cincinnati, a number of articles on such subjects as the
following: "What influence ought the Baptist denomination to
exert upon the religious and literary world-" "What influence do
we exert upon the religious and literary world-" "The importance
of religious education in the formation of the character of
youth-" There were discussed many more subjects of like
character.
The result of
the agitation was that a Manual Labor Institute was opened in
Franklin, in 1837, and became Franklin College, in 1844.
The Kalamazoo
Literary Institute, Michigan, was chartered March 21, 1837. It
was at first conducted as a branch of the State University, at
Ann Arbor, and was partly supported by appropriations from the
treasury of that institution. This anomalous state of affairs
terminated at about the close of 1846, when the branches were
all given up, and the resources and energies of the university
were concentrated at Ann Arbor.
The Baptists of
Kentucky selected Georgetown as the site of their college, and a
charter was obtained for the institution January 15, 1829.
William Stoughton was selected as President of the new
institution, but died en route to Georgetown to take up his
duties. Joel S. Bacon was elected president June 11, 1830. He
struggled manfully with the embarrassment occasioned by the lack
of funds, by suits and injunctions, and controversies over the
management of the property.
There was
formed in 1817 "the Baptist Society in South Carolina and
Georgia, for the education of pious young men, designed for the
ministry." The following extract is taken from an address sent
forth on the occasion:
By our
constitution, you will be informed of the designs which we
entertain, of the principles which are to guide our
operations, and of the methods which will define our
proceedings. To the formation of this union, we have been
induced by several considerations. The increasing demand in
several parts of our country for Baptist ministers with
suitable qualifications; the progress of general literature
in all classes of society, requiring a proportionate
improvement in those who exercise the sacred office; the
frequent instances which bring to our view young men of
piety and promise, destitute of the requisite means for
improving their talents, and a sincere hope, that with the
Divine blessing, our cooperation in the proposed measure
might contribute to the increase and extension of genuine
piety are some of the motives which have excited us to the
course into which we now affectionately invite your
benevolent activity. Such motives are so true in fact, and
so obvious to common inspection, that they must necessarily
disturb the repose of the indolent, and assail the
observation of the inconsiderate. In the field, brethren,
which we propose to cultivate, there is an impressive call
to united zeal and diligence.
So far are
we from wishing to arrogate to ourselves the merit of
originality in this scheme, that we take pleasure in
alleging the example of brethren in other places, as an
additional incentive to ardor, in a pursuit where they have
led the way. In different parts of the United States are
societies united for the accomplishment of designs, in all
respects like those for which we solicit your favorable
regard. Such examples inspire us with the greatest
confidence. But admitting that no other association
resembling that which we have contemplated had been formed,
is there any want of evidence in favor of its claims- Do not
the circumstances of many young brethren, eager to break
through opposing difficulties, and stand forth as the
ambassadors of Christ, make an affecting appeal to our piety
and exertion. Do not Christians of all denominations,
combining their energies in order to give greater prevalence
to the Word of Life, invite our endeavors to something that
may accord with the spirit and animation of the present
times- Does not that extensive union for missions, which
promises to embody the strength of our denomination in this
country, demonstrate the expediency of such methods as might
augment the number of laborers for a field of action so
widely diffused-
Reverend Silas
Mercer, in 1793, employed a teacher to, open a classical school
in his residence. Jesse Mercer attended this school. It could
not be called a theological seminary, but was designed to
furnish instruction to such ministers as cared to avail
themselves of its advantages. This school continued three years.
A conference of
ministers and others was held at Powelton, in May, 1801, and in
1803 the "General committee of Georgia Baptists" was formed.
Itinerant preaching and a school in the Creek nation were the
leading objects. It was determined the next year, at Kiokee,
that measures be taken to establish "the Baptist College of
Georgia." An attempt was made to obtain a charter from the
legislature, but this was refused because it was alleged that it
would injure the State University. An academy was opened at
Mount Enon, near Augusta, in 1807, which flourished for a period
and then declined.
Mr. Pennfield,
of Savannah, in 1829, bequeathed twenty-five hundred dollars for
educational purposes on the condition that the Convention raise
a like amount, which was quickly done. In January, 1833, a
manual labor school was opened, seven miles north of
Greensborough, with thirty pupils, a few of whom were
licentiates. In the first and second year a powerful revival was
experienced, and a large number professed conversion. The
village was called Pennfield and the school was named Mercer
Institute, in honor of Jesse Mercer, who has been called "the
most influential minister of the denomination ever reared in the
State" (The Christian Index, July 21, 1832).
Out of this
general movement grew Furman University of South Carolina. The
formation of a school in the State had long been agitated.
Consequently, in 1826, the Furman academy was established in
Edgefield Court House. It was not of long life, but the
theological department was preserved. After many struggles in
1851 Furman University was organized.
The Wake Forest
College, North Carolina, was established in 1834. At first the
institution was to be a manual labor school. So a large farm of
600 acres in Wake Forest county, near Raleigh was purchased and
Dr. Wait became president. The school passed through a long
period of debt and perplexities before it reached its present
large usefulness (The Christian Index, September 8,
1832).
The beginnings
of the Virginia Baptist Seminary are recorded in an appeal that
the Virginia Education Society, through a committee composed of
Eli Ball and William ands, made to the Baptist churches of that
State. The methods pursued accurately describe conditions of
other similar institutions of learning of those times. The
committee says:
This
Society has now been formed about two years; its object is
to aid pious young men, recommended by their respective
churches, in improving themselves for the ministry. None are
received except members of a Baptist church, of good report,
blameless deportment, and who give evidence of an aptitude
to teach. The great object of the Society is, to enable
those who have determined to consecrate themselves to this
most responsible office, to become qualified by a course of
study and mental discipline, for discharging with
faithfulness and ability their duties.
Eleven
young brethren are now under the care of the Society; the
greater portion of them under the care of bro. Edward
Baptist, and three of them are with bro. Ball. Others are
waiting to place themselves under the patronage of the
Society, as soon as the institution shall be ready to
receive them.
The Society
has hitherto encountered much difficulty and labored to
great disadvantage for want of a building where the students
could be collected together, and placed under the
superintendence of a teacher whose whole time could be
devoted to the work of instruction. This difficulty has been
removed by the purchase of a farm well adapted to the
purpose the Society had in view.
The farm
contains over 200 acres of land, the improvements are
sufficiently commodious, with a little expense, to
accommodate 30 or 40 students. The situation is pleasant and
perfectly healthy. It is situated in a Northern direction
from Richmond, about four and a half miles distant, and
about one-half mile West of the Brooke Turnpike.
It has
already been intimated that it is the intention of the
Society to connect manual labor with the instruction of the
students. They have two objects in view in this course;-to
lessen the expense and to improve the health of the
students. The greatest economy will be introduced into every
department of the Institution; the Society having solely in
view the important object of effecting the greatest possible
good with the smallest possible expense. They know and feel
sensibly the great destitution of our churches, and the
necessity of supplying that destitution as speedily as
possible, and this knowledge will govern them in all their
expenditures. A majority of the board are practical business
men, who have been taught by long experience to expend
nothing uselessly.
The
property has been secured to a body of trustees; men well
known and esteemed in their churches. Every precaution has
been taken to guard the Institution from falling into the
hands of individuals not members of a regular Baptist
church. In case of a departure from the principles of those
churches, they are bound to surrender their trust.
A teacher,
possessing the confidence of the brethren, Elder Robert
Ryland, has been appointed and daily expected. As possession
of the farm will be given on the 1st of July, the school
will then be ready to receive additional students, and will
go into immediate operation. It is not intended to have a
summer vacation.
The
purchase of the farm, with the growing crop, has cost the
Society $4,500. One-third of this sum will be wanted
immediately, as the first installment will be due on the
first of next month. This payment will be met by some of the
brethren in this city, but we trust that our brethren in the
country will not suffer them to bear this burden long.
It is very
desirable, that at least ten thousand dollars should be
obtained this year. The whole of the purchased money should
be paid without delay; and a very considerable expense must
be incurred in the purchase of a library, &c.-furniture and
provisions for the family;-altering and repairing the
buildings;-providing stock for the farm, implements of
husbandry, mechanical tools, &c.-as well as the salary of
the Principal. Our friends who have funds on hand, or who
can furnish them in a short time, are requested to forward
them without delay (The Christian Index, July 7,
1832).
A charter was
obtained in 1842 and it became Richmond College.
Approximating
the close of the period now under survey several other important
schools were founded. In this list is included Mississippi
College; the Judson in 1838 and the Howard, in Alabama;
the Union, 1842, in Tennessee. In all of these states
where these schools are located there were many preliminary
efforts leading to their formation. The Colombian College
delayed some of these organizations; and after they were formed
they weakened the influence of that institution. American
policies have run largely on state lines.
It was apparent
to all Baptists who had studied the situation that something was
lacking in their organization. The association had been the unit
of their counsel and missionary operations. The Triennial
Convention was made up of missionary societies and such other
bodies as cared to cooperate. To remedy this manifest defect
State Conventions, or General Associations, were formed in
various states. These gave a medium of communication, a rallying
place for all of the interests in the bounds of the state, and a
method of coordinating the work of the several states. These
conventions brought compactness and unity of purpose to the
churches of the denomination.
By the year
1832 there were fourteen state organizations as follows: New
York and South Carolina, 1821; Virginia and Georgia, 1822;
Connecticut and Alabama, 1823; Massachusetts, Vermont and Maine,
1824; New Hampshire and Rhode Island, 1825; and New Jersey and
North Carolina, 1830.
The Triennial
Convention was constituted preeminently in the interests of
foreign missions; and while it had given some attention to home
missions, many persons felt that this was only a secondary
consideration. This feeling was especially true in the vast
territory of the new states of the West. A numerously attended
General Meeting of the Western Baptists in Cincinnati, was held
November 6, 1833. As a result of this preliminary gathering the
Convention of Western Baptists, assembled in the same city,
November 5, 1834. It was declared that "the business of this
Convention shall be to encourage and promote, by all lawful
means the following objects, to-wit:
Missions,
both domestic and foreign; ministerial education, for such
as have first been licensed by the churches; Sunday schools,
including Bible classes; religious periodicals; tract and
temperance societies, as well as all others warranted by
Christ in the gospel.
The following
statements were made in regard to domestic. missions:
In the
Report upon Home Missions presented to this body last year,
we had a general exhibition of the disorganized and
inefficient condition of the Baptist denomination in years
gone by, particularly in the western states, together with
some of the natural causes of so deplorable a state of
things; also, a brief outline of our home missionary
operations in the different states, and the abundant success
with which God has crowned these efforts. Your committee
deem it unnecessary, at so early a period, to survey the,
same ground again. According to the report above named,
regularly organized associations for missionary purposes
were in successful operation in four of the western states,
viz.: Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky and Tennessee. In Illinois,
Missouri, Arkansas, and some of the states further South,
the work was going on through the agency of the Baptist Home
Mission Society with increasing success, and local societies
were forming for the carrying on of the good work in a more
systematic and efficient manner. To these statements we need
only add, that the Illinois Baptist convention has been
organized, and in Missouri the brethren have taken measures
for a similar organization (Proceedings of the fist
Anniversary of the General Convention of Western Baptists,
at Cincinnati, 7. Cincinnati, 1835).
Sunday schools
had made no great progress; and those who favored such schools
were usually on the defensive. There was much opposition
manifested from many sources. While they had not attained the
efficiency and popularity of later times, they had begun to fill
a large place in Christian instruction.
"There are many
individuals of our denomination in the West," says J. M. Peck,
"and sometimes whole churches, who are opposed to Sunday
schools. The cause is from misunderstanding the design and plan
of such institutions among Baptists. They imagine that
Sunday-school teaching by others is to instill into the minds of
children sentiments, and form habits, not in accordance with
their views of divine truth; or else to teach children head
religion merely, and leave the heart unaffected; and that their
tendency will be eventually to exclude the Spirit of God in
conversion. If these brethren could be convinced that this is
not the design, nor the tendency of these institutions, they
would not only approve, but cordially cooperate in sustaining
them. We pretend not but some unwise persons may have spoken of
Sunday-school instruction in an unguarded manner, and produced
the impression of this tendency. But let our brethren look at
this subject without prejudice, make themselves acquainted with
the facts pertaining to it, distinguish properly between the
good, the imperfect, and the wrong modes of instruction, and
they will perceive that their fears, distrust and jealousies are
without foundation.
"The committee
pretend not to advocate, or even approve all schools taught on
the Lord-s day, and which may be denominated Sunday schools, or
of all things that may be taught in such institutions. They wish
their brethren, as they do themselves, to make due
discrimination. They advocate Sunday schools and Bible class
instruction on the same broad principles as they do public
preaching, and instruction from house to house. No one approves
all kinds of preaching, nor all that is preached even by good
men; no one approves all kinds of Sunday schools, nor of all
that may be taught therein. And it would be just as unwise and
unfair to oppose all preaching, as to oppose all kinds of
Sunday-school instruction" (Report on Sunday Schools and
Bible Classes, November 7, 1834. Proceedings of the First
Anniversary of the General Convention of Western Baptists, 19.
Cincinnati, 1835). Such was the spirit and temper of the times
in regard to Sunday schools, and these opinions prevailed not
only in the Vest but in many other sections of the country.
The American
and Foreign Bible Society was formed by the ^cession of members
of the Baptist denomination from the American Bible Society, in
1836, because the Board declined to render aid in printing the
Bengalee Scriptures translated on the principle adopted by the
American Baptist missionaries in Burmah, involving the
translation of the word baptizo. The seceding parties
organized the American and Foreign Bible Society May 12, 1836.
Its efforts were expended chiefly in foreign fields, in the
missions of the Baptist denomination (Baird, The Christian
Retrospect anal Register).
The first local
Baptist Publication Society was formed in New England in 1811,
under the name of the Evangelical Tract Society. It was "not,
however, strongly denominational, never became vigorous, and has
long since ceased to exist except in name. The necessity of some
means for the publication of Baptist tracts was very generally
felt in different sections of the country. John S. Meehan and
the students for the ministry under the care of Dr. Stoughton,
in Philadelphia, as early as 1820, discussed the question of
organizing a society for this purpose. But Mr. Meehan-s sudden
removal to Washington, D C., prevented the consummation of their
plan. Rev. Samuel Cornelius, of Virginia, and others seriously
contemplated a movement in this direction. It was reserved in
the providence of God for Rev. Noah Davis-, a young minister
ordained at Saulsbury, Maryland, December 21, 1823, to take the
first effectual steps toward the organization of a tract
society. Very soon after his ordination he wrote a letter on the
subject to Mr. J. D. Knowles, his former class mate, a student
at Colombian College, Washington, D. C., and editor of The
Colombian Star. The letter was the occasion of much
conversation, and led to a meeting on the 25th of February,
1824, at the house of Mr. George Wood, in Washington, for the
purpose of organization. It was originated "as a national
society, a center round which the Baptists of every section of
the country might rally, a fountain from which should go out
streams of blessing to every corner of the land. Its support,
however, for the first few years came almost exclusively from
southern Baptists." Of the $1,010.33 received the first two
years, all but $133.73 came from the southern States.
"About six
weeks after the Society-s organization a few tracts were
printed, and the first Depository was opened April 2, 1824, in
the office of The Colombian Star, Washington, D. C. At
first it was under the care of Mr. John S. Meehan, afterwards in
charge of Mr. Baron Stow, then a student in Colombian College.
On November 14, 1826, a special meeting of the Society was held
in Washington, at which it was resolved to transfer the
headquarters of the Society to Philadelphia. This was done that
better facilities for shipping to southern cities and elsewhere
might be secured. A committee of brethren residing in
Philadelphia was appointed to act in behalf of the Board, and on
the 25th of December of the same year that committee convened in
the house of Dr. J. L.. Dagg. The first meeting of the Society
in that city was held January 7, 1827, Dr. Dagg acted as
chairman and Dr. Howard Malcolm as secretary" (Fiftieth
Annual Report of the American Baptist Publication Society,
7-12).
The first
religious periodical published by the Baptists in this country
was The American Baptist Magazine, established in 1814.
The Western New York Baptist Magazine was edited and
published by the Hamilton Baptist Missionary Society. The
Latter Day Luminary was commenced by a committee of the
Baptist Board of Foreign Missions, in Philadelphia, 1818. For
the first four years it was published every three months, in
1822 it was removed to Washington and appeared monthly. The
Christian Watchman, a weekly paper, was established in
Boston, in the beginning of the year 1820. The Religious
Intelligencer, a weekly paper, was published in Providence,
Rhode Island, in May 1820. The Colombian Star, began in
February, 1822. On the same day The Christian Secretary
began in Hartford, Connecticut. About the same time The
Waterville Intelligencer was printed in Waterville, Maine.
In the year
1836 the following Baptist newspapers were published in the
United States: Zion-s Advocate, Maine, Adam Wilson,
Editor; The Eastern Baptist, Maine; The New Hampshire
Baptist Register, Edmund Worth, Editor; The Vermont
Telegraph, Orson S. Murray, Editor; The Sabbath School
Treasury, Boston, J. H. Purkitt, Editor; The Christian
Review, James D. Knowles, Editor;. The Baptist Register,
Utica, New York, Alex. M. Beebe, Editor; The American
Baptist, Jonathan Going, Editor; The Mothers Journal,
Utica, New York, Mrs. M. Kingsfort, Editor; The Perennial
Register, Philadelphia, I. M. Allen, Editor; The Monthly
Tracts, Philadelphia; The Monthly Paper, I. M.
Allen, Editor; The Witness, Pittsburgh, Samuel Williams,
Editor; The Religious Herald, Richmond, William Sands,
Editor; The Biblical Recorder, Newbern, North Carolina,
Thomas Meredith, Editor; The Southern Baptist,
Charleston; The Christian Index, Washington, Georgia,
Mercer and Stokes, Editors; The Jackson. vine Register,
Alabama, William Wood, Editor; The Baptist, Nashville, R.
B. C. Howell, Editor; The Baptist Banner, Shelbyville,
Kentucky, John L. Walter, Editor; The Cross and Baptist
Journal, Cincinnati, J. Stevens, Editor; The Baptist
Advocate, Cincinnati, J: Stevens, Editor; The Pioneer,
Upper Alton, Illinois, J. M. Peck, Editor; The Baptist
Memorial, New York, was established January, 1842,
Rufus Babcock and J. C. Choules, Editors. The oldest Journal
West of the Alleghany Mountains was The Gospel Herald,
1813, published at Frankfort, Kentucky, by Silas M. Noel (Henry
C. Vedder, Journalism in the Baptist Church in the United
States, The Chautauquan, August, 1895. XXI. 602) .
There were many
other institutions established among the Baptists which were to
attain mighty proportions. Such were Sunday schools, temperance
societies, and others of like character, but they were either
just beginning or had not as yet attained prominence.
Books for further reference:
Henry M. King,
Education among the Baptists of this Country during the last One
Hundred Years, The Baptist Quarterly, X. 445-466.
Philadelphia, 1876.
Alvah Hovey,
Progress of a Century, The Baptist Quarterly, X. 467-489.
E. Thresher, An
Address prepared for the Semi-Centennial of Denison University,
The Baptist Review, III. 572-592. Cincinnati, 1881.
James D.
Knowles, History of the Columbian College, District of Columbia,
The Christian Review, II. 115-136. Boston, 1837.
Ministerial
Education in Georgia, The Christian Review, II . 579-584.
Philip Schaff,
Progress of Christianity in the United States, The Princeton
Review, LX. 209-252. New York, 1879.
James David
Butler, American Pre-Revolutionary Bibliography, Bibliotheca
Sacra, XXXVI. 72-104. Andover, 1879.
Daniel C.
Stevens, The American Baptist Publication Society. One Hundred
years of Service and Growth, The Review and Expositor,
XXI. 397-407. Louisville, 1924.
|